Astro Bob: Satellite streaks spoil Hubble photos
The spectacular increase in the number of satellites in recent years is now affecting Hubble images.
If you thought the ever-increasing number of satellites affected your enjoyment of the night sky, it's also afflicting the Hubble and other orbiting observatories. Volleys of satellites, particularly the SpaceX Starlinks , which now number around 3,600, photobomb the images and contaminate valuable scientific data. Ground-based observatories are experiencing the same bombardment, infuriating professional and amateur astronomers alike.
While SpaceX has tried to mitigate the problem by adjusting the tilt of the Starlinks so they reflect less sunlight and therefore appear fainter, their sheer number has become overwhelming. For me, they're just a nuisance. When studying a nebula or planet through the telescope, a satellite (or a stream of satellites) invariably meanders across the field of view, ruining both the sight and my concentration. If you're doing research, it's worse.
In a recent paper published in Nature , Sandor Kruk (Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Germany) and his team discovered a disturbing trend in Hubble photos taken between 2002 and 2021.
With the help of the citizen-science group Asteroid Hunters and a pair of data-mining algorithms, they found that satellite trails crossed 2.7% of the Hubble images (with a typical exposure time of 11 minutes) and that the fraction of photos with trails increases by roughly 50% over the time frame. By 2021, you had a 6% chance of running across a streak in a Hubble image. Those numbers are in line with the 40% uptick in the number of satellites sent into orbit between 2005 and 2021.
I hate to sound like the Grim Reaper, but things are only getting worse. Satellite "constellations" like Starlink and OneWeb , both of which provide broadband internet service, continue to grow. Within a few years, SpaceX hopes to have 42,000 Starlinks in orbit. OneWeb has 542 as of early January 2023 but plans to expand its fleet to 7,000. China aims to launch nearly 13,000 satellites to provide world-wide internet services to compete with Elon Musk.
The Combined Force Space Component Command (CFSCC) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California currently tracks and catalogs 32,750 objects 19.7 inches (50 cm) or larger in orbit. The European Space Agency's space debris office estimates there are 36,500 objects larger than 3.9 inches (10cm); 1 million objects between 0.4-3.9 inches (1-10cm), and a mind-boggling 130 million objects between 0.04-0.4 inch (1mm to 1cm) circling the planet.
Hubble isn't alone. NASA's Near-Earth Object Widefield Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) and the European Exoplanet satellite (CHEOPS), which makes precision observations of planets around other stars, are also affected. Not to mention the International Space Station and China's Tiangong Space Station.
Skyrocketing satellite numbers could result in additional space debris and its consequences — collisions with active satellites and space telescopes. Thankfully, the recently launched Webb Space Telescope, located nearly a million miles from Earth, is unaffected by satellites.
Software can remove some of the narrow streaks, but not the wide ones, which occur when a satellite passes closer to the Hubble and etches a brighter trail. The thick band of light that results makes the photo essentially worthless. Kruk and his colleagues estimate that by the 2030s satellites will mark between 20% and possibly as high as 50% of Hubble's images.
Satellite-watching can be fun. I first enjoyed it as a kid. My friends and I would sprawl out on the sidewalk, hands cupped behind our heads, and wait for them to appear. Nowadays, a straight line of 60 Starlinks parading across the sky continues to be a mesmerizing sight. But if we're not careful we may find it harder and harder to escape what we make. Boxed in, we'd lose more than just data.