Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement
Robin Huebner

Former TV anchor alleges age discrimination in demotion

Email Sign up for Breaking News Alerts
entertainment Park Rapids,Minnesota 56470 http://www.parkrapidsenterprise.com/sites/default/files/styles/square_300/public/fieldimages/22/0304/1018robin1.jpg?itok=WAg_qK_c
Park Rapids Enterprise
(218) 732-8757 customer support
Former TV anchor alleges age discrimination in demotion
Park Rapids Minnesota PO Box 111 56470

FARGO - Former TV anchor Robin Huebner's age and gender discrimination complaint against the station she'd been at since 1985 will be decided in a legal arena where blatant bias violations are increasingly rare, employment lawyers said Tuesday.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Huebner resigned her anchor post Monday at "Valley News Live," which airs on KVLY and KXJB, and her lawyer said she is considering a lawsuit alleging age and gender discrimination by the station after being replaced in the 10 p.m. newscast by a younger female co-anchor.

Before turning to the courts, workers alleging employment discrimination first must file a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or EEOC.

Huebner's lawyer, James Kaster, said Monday that she filed a complaint with the commission roughly a week ago, but the claim is not a public document.

"Anything in the pre-litigation stage is protected by privacy statutes," said Christine Nazer, a spokeswoman for the EEOC. "We can't even confirm or deny the existence of a charge filing."

A complainant is not prohibited from releasing the document laying out the alleged discrimination, but Kaster so far has declined to do so.

Employees and employers in a discrimination dispute can agree to try to settle the complaint through mediation.

Otherwise, following a 60-day waiting period, complainants who want to pursue their claim in court first must get permission from the EEOC, said Lisa Edison-Smith, a local employment law attorney who is not involved in the case.

Lawyers representing both employees and employers in discrimination grievances said blatant cases of bias are rare today.

"Employers are more savvy than they used to be even five or 10 years ago," said Tom Fiebiger, a Fargo lawyer who represents employees. "You don't usually have that smoking gun that says, 'We have to get rid of all of the old people here."

Edison-Smith, who usually represents employers, agreed workplace discrimination cases in recent years usually have centered on more subtle allegations.

In Huebner's case, "Ultimately she has to prove is some form of intent to discriminate," Edison-Smith said

For instance, someone could allege that they were fired and replaced by someone much younger. Both North Dakota and federal law consider workers 40 and over to be protected from age discrimination.

Therefore, those claiming to be victims of age discrimination must show they were replaced by someone "substantially younger" or outside the protected group, Edison-Smith said.

Fiebiger said, "Historically my experience has been the age cases are more difficult to prove" than gender cases.

Juries seem more willing to find employers guilty of retaliating against an employee who has alleged discrimination, such as termination or demotion, he said.

Kaster spoke of the burdens of proof Huebner must be able to meet in her age and gender bias claims during an interview Tuesday afternoon on "The Jay Thomas Show" on WDAY-AM.

Because of a 2009 U.S. Surpreme Court decision, age bias plaintiffs must show age was a "determinative factor" for their alleged discrimination. By contrast, those contending gender bias must show their sex was a "motivating standard," Kaster said.

"At the end of the day, when you unscramble all of the jury instructions, it doesn't make a lot of difference," he said of the different evidence burdens.

Last year, the EEOC received almost 100,000 employment discrimination complaints. Race was the most common bias complaint, accounting for 36 percent of the claims, followed by sex discrimination, 29 percent, disability 25 percent, and age, 23 percent.

Of those almost 100,000 cases, the EEOC filed 271 lawsuits on behalf of employees. The vast majority are dismissed or settled, Nazer said.

"We always try to resolve these disputes out of court if we can," she said.

Responding to The Forum's story about ex-anchor Robin Huebner's allegations of gender and age bias in the wake of her resignation Monday, the head of Valley News Live said in a Tuesday newscast that she wasn't forced out and chose to take a pay cut.

Huebner in August went from co-anchoring a 10 p.m. newscast on both KVLY and KXJB to anchoring the 5:30 p.m. KXJB broadcast. She continued to co-anchor at 6 p.m. on KVLY. The 50-year-old, a 26-year veteran of the station, was replaced in the 10 p.m. slot by Stephanie Goetz, a 26-year-old.

Via a lawyer, Jim Kaster of Minneapolis, Huebner has said she is considering filing a lawsuit claiming she was demoted because of her age and gender. She felt forced out because of the move to 5:30 p.m. and an accompanying pay cut, Kaster said.

Jim Wareham, general manager and president of KXJB and KVLY, did not respond to interview requests by The Forum on Monday or Tuesday, but he did make an on-air statement Tuesday night.

Wareham said Huebner had been given a choice of new responsibilities during the shakeup and chose the role that carried a pay cut. He noted she was, as she'd been before, anchoring two newscasts for Valley News Live when she offered her resignation Monday. His statement

didn't address Huebner's accusations of age and gender bias.

Following Wareham's on-air piece, Kaster said on Tuesday night that Hueb-ner's salary dropped about one-third when she moved to the 5:30 p.m. newscast. If she wanted her pay to stay the same, Huebner would have had to agree to give up the anchor desk to be a reporter, Kaster said.

Kaster alleged it was a tactic on the part of Valley News Live that anticipated eventual litigation, saying it was "absurd" to say she chose a lower pay rate.

Wareham also took The Forum to task for failing to note in the story that ran Tuesday that it's owned by Forum Communications Co., which also owns WDAY-TV in Fargo and WDAZ-TV in Grand Forks - stations he said were in "a competitive news battle with Valley News Live."

"Why not disclose the conflict? Makes you wonder why, doesn't it?" he asked in the on-air spot.

Matthew Von Pinnon, editor of The Forum, said the shared ownership of the newspaper and the TV stations wasn't mentioned because the article wasn't about media competition.

"In fact, it's really a story about how they dealt with an employee," Von Pinnon said. "We weren't writing about who's on top."

The shared owner of The Forum, WDAY and WDAZ is routinely mentioned in Forum stories about the stations, as well as in stories about WDAY 970 AM, a Fargo radio station also owned by Forum Communications Co., he said.

Advertisement
news@parkrapidsenterprise.com
Advertisement
Advertisement